GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs with GeForce 9800 GTX+, including specs and performance data.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs outperforms 9800 GTX+ by a whopping 620% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 436 | 991 |
Place by popularity | 80 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.03 |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | G92B |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 15 August 2020 (3 years ago) | 16 January 2009 (15 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $229 |
Current price | no data | $151 (0.7x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 128 |
CUDA cores | no data | 128 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 738 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 754 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 55 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 141 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | no data | 105 °C |
Texture fill rate | no data | 47.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | no data | 470.0 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and GeForce 9800 GTX+ compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Interface | no data | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Height | no data | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Width | no data | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 6-pin |
SLI options | no data | + |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | no data | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | no data | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | no data | 1100 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 70.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | HDTVDual Link DVI |
Multi monitor support | no data | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | no data | S/PDIF |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12_1 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | no data | 4.0 |
OpenGL | no data | 2.1 |
OpenCL | no data | 1.1 |
Vulkan | no data | N/A |
CUDA | no data | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 26
+767%
| 3−4
−767%
|
1440p | 16
+700%
| 2−3
−700%
|
4K | 12
+1100%
| 1−2
−1100%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 20
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 22
+633%
|
3−4
−633%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21
+950%
|
2−3
−950%
|
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+625%
|
4−5
−625%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 36
+620%
|
5−6
−620%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 16
+700%
|
2−3
−700%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+633%
|
3−4
−633%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
+767%
|
3−4
−767%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+667%
|
6−7
−667%
|
Hitman 3 | 24
+700%
|
3−4
−700%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 46
+667%
|
6−7
−667%
|
Metro Exodus | 35
+775%
|
4−5
−775%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 17
+750%
|
2−3
−750%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 38
+660%
|
5−6
−660%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 22
+633%
|
3−4
−633%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 19
+850%
|
2−3
−850%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18
+800%
|
2−3
−800%
|
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+625%
|
4−5
−625%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 32
+700%
|
4−5
−700%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 13
+1200%
|
1−2
−1200%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+633%
|
3−4
−633%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
+767%
|
3−4
−767%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+667%
|
6−7
−667%
|
Hitman 3 | 22
+633%
|
3−4
−633%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 112
+700%
|
14−16
−700%
|
Metro Exodus | 28
+833%
|
3−4
−833%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 15
+650%
|
2−3
−650%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30
+650%
|
4−5
−650%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30
+650%
|
4−5
−650%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 84
+740%
|
10−11
−740%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 23
+667%
|
3−4
−667%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 11
+1000%
|
1−2
−1000%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+633%
|
3−4
−633%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+667%
|
6−7
−667%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 23
+667%
|
3−4
−667%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 24
+700%
|
3−4
−700%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
+750%
|
4−5
−750%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+800%
|
2−3
−800%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
+650%
|
2−3
−650%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
+1000%
|
1−2
−1000%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 16
+700%
|
2−3
−700%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+750%
|
2−3
−750%
|
Hitman 3 | 12−14
+1200%
|
1−2
−1200%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
Metro Exodus | 12−14
+1200%
|
1−2
−1200%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 19
+850%
|
2−3
−850%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
+700%
|
2−3
−700%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8 | 0−1 |
Hitman 3 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
Metro Exodus | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and 9800 GTX+ compete in popular games:
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 767% faster in 1080p
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 700% faster in 1440p
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 1100% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 9.43 | 1.31 |
Recency | 15 August 2020 | 16 January 2009 |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 55 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 141 Watt |
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800 GTX+ in performance tests.
Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook card while GeForce 9800 GTX+ is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.