Tesla V100 SXM2 vs Iris Xe Graphics G4

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTiger Lake GT2GV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 September 2020 (5 years ago)21 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3845120
Core clock speed300 MHz1370 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40438.4
Floating-point processing power0.8448 TFLOPSno data
ROPs12128
TMUs24320
L3 Cache3.75 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1758 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data900.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2020 21 June 2017
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G4 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G4 and Tesla V100 SXM2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G4 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla V100 SXM2 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
Iris Xe Graphics G4
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2
Tesla V100 SXM2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 241 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 46 votes

Rate Tesla V100 SXM2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G4 or Tesla V100 SXM2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.