T600 Max-Q vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking754not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.32no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3eTU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date5 September 2014 (11 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384896
Core clock speed300 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1395 MHz
Number of transistors189 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate38.4078.12
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS2.5 TFLOPS
ROPs632
TMUs4856
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.801.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2014 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 40 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 166.7% lower power consumption.

T600 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and T600 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop graphics card while T600 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
NVIDIA T600 Max-Q
T600 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 16 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate T600 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics P6300 or T600 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.