Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Iris Pro Graphics P6300 with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Pro Graphics P6300 by a whopping 557% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 762 | 256 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 19.36 | 54.54 |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | Broadwell GT3e | AD107 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 5 September 2014 (11 years ago) | 26 February 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | 2025 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 189 million | 18,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 129.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6144 TFLOPS | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 6 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 16 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 12 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Width | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 128.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.78 | 24.84 |
| Recency | 5 September 2014 | 26 February 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 133.3% lower power consumption.
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 557.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 in performance tests.
Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
