GeForce RTX 5090 D vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and GeForce RTX 5090 D, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300
2014
15 Watt
3.58

5090 D outperforms Pro Graphics P6300 by a whopping 2547% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7422
Place by popularitynot in top-10010
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data22.57
Power efficiency19.2213.27
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3eGB202
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 September 2014 (11 years ago)30 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38421760
Core clock speed300 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors189 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt575 Watt
Texture fill rate38.401,636.8
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS104.8 TFLOPS
ROPs6176
TMUs48680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170
L1 Cacheno data21.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.801.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 3.58
RTX 5090 D 94.76
+2547%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 1582
Samples: 20
RTX 5090 D 42305
+2574%
Samples: 27

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.58 94.76
Recency 5 September 2014 30 January 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 575 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 3733.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090 D, on the other hand, has a 2546.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5090 D is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D
GeForce RTX 5090 D

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 16 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 1748 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics P6300 or GeForce RTX 5090 D, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.