UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs Iris Pro Graphics P580

Place in the ranking	623	651
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	24.14	no data
Architecture	Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)	Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code name	Skylake GT4e	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 September 2015 (9 years ago)	11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	576	32
Core clock speed	350 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	1450 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	75.60	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.21 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	9	no data
TMUs	72	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

Ring Bus

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4	no data
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	no data
Memory bus width	System Shared	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	no data
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	18−21 +0%	18 +0%
1440p	27−30 +8%	25 −8%
4K	12−14 +0%	12 +0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +10%	10 −10%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +0%	22 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 −20%	12 +20%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −7.7%	14 +7.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +6.7%	15 −6.7%
Valorant	16−18 +23.1%	12−14 −23.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Dota 2	16−18 −11.8%	19 +11.8%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +8.7%	23 −8.7%
Fortnite	30−35 +10.7%	27−30 −10.7%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +29.4%	17 −29.4%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +54.5%	11 −54.5%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +85.7%	7 −85.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +10%	40−45 −10%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +300%	4 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Valorant	16−18 +23.1%	12−14 −23.1%
World of Tanks	85−90 +9%	75−80 −9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Dota 2	16−18 −94.1%	33 +94.1%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +8.7%	21−24 −8.7%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +37.5%	16 −37.5%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +10%	40−45 −10%
Valorant	16−18 +23.1%	12−14 −23.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Grand Theft Auto V	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +6.3%	30−35 −6.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
World of Tanks	35−40 +11.8%	30−35 −11.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Counter-Strike 2	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Valorant	14−16 +7.7%	12−14 −7.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 +15.4%	12−14 −15.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 +41.7%	12 −41.7%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Fortnite	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Valorant	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%

This is how Iris Pro Graphics P580 and UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compete in popular games:

A tie in 1080p
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is 8% faster in 1440p
A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Pro Graphics P580 is 300% faster.
in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 94% faster.

All in all, in popular games: