UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Iris Pro Graphics P580 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Pro Graphics P580 outperforms Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 683 | 823 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 24.72 | 8.84 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | Skylake GT4e | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 (10 years ago) | 28 May 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 576 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 189 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm+ | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 12-25 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 75.60 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.21 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 9 | no data |
| TMUs | 72 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | Ring Bus | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | no data |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 21−24
+61.5%
| 13
−61.5%
|
| 4K | 14−16
+55.6%
| 9
−55.6%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+29.4%
|
17
−29.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−11
+100%
|
5
−100%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
+150%
|
8
−150%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+37.5%
|
16
−37.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+87.5%
|
8−9
−87.5%
|
| Fortnite | 27−30
+93.3%
|
14−16
−93.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+53.3%
|
14−16
−53.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16
+100%
|
7−8
−100%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
+35.7%
|
14−16
−35.7%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+32.6%
|
45−50
−32.6%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
+100%
|
10−11
−100%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+450%
|
4
−450%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 80−85
+180%
|
30
−180%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
| Dota 2 | 40−45
+90.9%
|
22
−90.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+87.5%
|
8−9
−87.5%
|
| Fortnite | 27−30
+93.3%
|
14−16
−93.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+53.3%
|
14−16
−53.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16
+100%
|
7−8
−100%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+129%
|
7
−129%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
+350%
|
2
−350%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
+35.7%
|
14−16
−35.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+40%
|
10
−40%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+32.6%
|
45−50
−32.6%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
+100%
|
10−11
−100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
| Dota 2 | 40−45
+110%
|
20
−110%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+87.5%
|
8−9
−87.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+53.3%
|
14−16
−53.3%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
+35.7%
|
14−16
−35.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+180%
|
5
−180%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+32.6%
|
45−50
−32.6%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 27−30
+93.3%
|
14−16
−93.3%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 35−40
+68.2%
|
21−24
−68.2%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+38.5%
|
24−27
−38.5%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
+96.3%
|
27−30
−96.3%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+71.4%
|
7−8
−71.4%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 10−11
+100%
|
5−6
−100%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 24−27
+71.4%
|
14−16
−71.4%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+88.9%
|
9
−88.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
This is how Iris Pro Graphics P580 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is 62% faster in 1080p
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is 56% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Pro Graphics P580 is 450% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, Iris Pro Graphics P580 surpassed UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) in all 56 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.83 | 2.88 |
| Recency | 1 September 2015 | 28 May 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 12 Watt |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 has a 67.7% higher aggregate performance score.
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
