Radeon RX 6650M XT vs Iris Pro Graphics P580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon RX 6650M XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Pro Graphics P580
2015
64 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
4.83

6650M XT outperforms Pro Graphics P580 by a whopping 745% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking685113
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.7926.19
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameSkylake GT4eNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)4 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5762048
Core clock speed350 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz2416 MHz
Number of transistors189 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate75.60309.2
Floating-point processing power1.21 TFLOPS9.896 TFLOPS
ROPs964
TMUs72128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Iris Pro Graphics P580 4.83
RX 6650M XT 40.82
+745%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Pro Graphics P580 2020
Samples: 30
RX 6650M XT 16081
+696%
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−927%
220−230
+927%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−870%
95−100
+870%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 8−9
−1313%
110−120
+1313%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 20−22
−585%
130−140
+585%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−927%
220−230
+927%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−870%
95−100
+870%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−773%
130−140
+773%
Fortnite 27−30
−510%
170−180
+510%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−591%
150−160
+591%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−829%
130−140
+829%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−737%
150−160
+737%
Valorant 60−65
−287%
230−240
+287%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 20−22
−585%
130−140
+585%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−927%
220−230
+927%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
−232%
270−280
+232%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−870%
95−100
+870%
Dota 2 40−45
−248%
140−150
+248%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−773%
130−140
+773%
Fortnite 27−30
−510%
170−180
+510%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−591%
150−160
+591%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−829%
130−140
+829%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−738%
130−140
+738%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−1000%
95−100
+1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−737%
150−160
+737%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%
Valorant 60−65
−287%
230−240
+287%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 20−22
−585%
130−140
+585%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−870%
95−100
+870%
Dota 2 40−45
−248%
140−150
+248%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−773%
130−140
+773%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−591%
150−160
+591%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−737%
150−160
+737%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%
Valorant 60−65
−287%
230−240
+287%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
−510%
170−180
+510%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−960%
100−110
+960%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−684%
290−300
+684%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−2050%
85−90
+2050%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1425%
60−65
+1425%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−386%
170−180
+386%
Valorant 50−55
−404%
260−270
+404%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
−2500%
100−110
+2500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1533%
45−50
+1533%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−1022%
100−110
+1022%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−892%
110−120
+892%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
−1000%
110−120
+1000%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−475%
90−95
+475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6600%
65−70
+6600%
Valorant 24−27
−946%
250−260
+946%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
−3200%
65−70
+3200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Dota 2 16−18
−576%
110−120
+576%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−1060%
55−60
+1060%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6650M XT is 6600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT performs better in 57 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.83 40.82
Recency 1 September 2015 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 120 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P580 has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 700% lower power consumption.

RX 6650M XT, on the other hand, has a 745% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics P580 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 5 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 79 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics P580 or Radeon RX 6650M XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.