RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs Iris Pro Graphics P580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Pro Graphics P580 with RTX 5000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Iris Pro Graphics P580
2015
64 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
5.24

RTX 5000 Ada Generation outperforms Iris Pro Graphics P580 by a whopping 1216% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking61426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.6420.24
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameSkylake GT4eAD102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores57612800
Core clock speed350 MHz1155 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz2550 MHz
Number of transistors189 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate75.601,020
Floating-point processing power1.21 TFLOPS65.28 TFLOPS
ROPs9176
TMUs72400
Tensor Coresno data400
Ray Tracing Coresno data100

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 GB32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data576.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Pro Graphics P580 5.24
RTX 5000 Ada Generation 68.95
+1216%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Pro Graphics P580 2020
RTX 5000 Ada Generation 26592
+1216%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−1186%
180−190
+1186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−1186%
180−190
+1186%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−1112%
400−450
+1112%
Hitman 3 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−1112%
400−450
+1112%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1208%
170−180
+1208%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−1186%
180−190
+1186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−1216%
250−260
+1216%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−1177%
600−650
+1177%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−1186%
180−190
+1186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−1186%
180−190
+1186%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−1112%
400−450
+1112%
Hitman 3 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−1112%
400−450
+1112%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1208%
170−180
+1208%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−1186%
180−190
+1186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−1216%
250−260
+1216%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−1178%
230−240
+1178%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−1177%
600−650
+1177%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−1186%
180−190
+1186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−1112%
400−450
+1112%
Hitman 3 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−1112%
400−450
+1112%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−1216%
250−260
+1216%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−1178%
230−240
+1178%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−1177%
600−650
+1177%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−1186%
180−190
+1186%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1208%
170−180
+1208%
Hitman 3 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−1112%
400−450
+1112%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Hitman 3 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.24 68.95
Recency 1 September 2015 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P580 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 1215.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics P580 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a notebook card while RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics P580
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 71 vote

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.