Radeon RX 6600 XT vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Place in the ranking	693	90
Place by popularity	not in top-100	87
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	63.42
Power efficiency	18.36	18.65
Architecture	Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Broadwell GT3e	Navi 23
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	5 September 2014 (10 years ago)	30 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2048
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1968 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	2589 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	160 Watt
Texture fill rate	52.80	331.4
Floating-point processing power	0.8448 TFLOPS	10.6 TFLOPS
ROPs	6	64
TMUs	48	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	190 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	+	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 3.95

RX 6600 XT 42.80
+984%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 1523

RX 6600 XT 16511
+984%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 2766

RX 6600 XT 39051
+1312%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 1737

RX 6600 XT 28342
+1532%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 15388

RX 6600 XT 156297
+916%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	12−14 −1025%	135 +1025%
1440p	7−8 −1000%	77 +1000%
4K	3−4 −1333%	43 +1333%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.81
1440p	no data	4.92
4K	no data	8.81

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8

−1029%

79
+1029%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −718%	90−95 +718%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −4200%	129 +4200%
Battlefield 5	9−10 −1422%	130−140 +1422%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −856%	85−90 +856%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1014%	78 +1014%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1038%	90−95 +1038%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 −855%	100−110 +855%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −765%	190−200 +765%
Hitman 3	9−10 −1100%	108 +1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −544%	170−180 +544%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −1800%	130−140 +1800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −870%	95−100 +870%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −960%	150−160 +960%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −217%	130−140 +217%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −718%	90−95 +718%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −3433%	106 +3433%
Battlefield 5	9−10 −1422%	130−140 +1422%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −856%	85−90 +856%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −986%	76 +986%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1038%	90−95 +1038%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 −855%	100−110 +855%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −765%	190−200 +765%
Hitman 3	9−10 −1100%	108 +1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −544%	170−180 +544%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −1800%	130−140 +1800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −870%	95−100 +870%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −1293%	209 +1293%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −450%	85−90 +450%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −217%	130−140 +217%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −718%	90−95 +718%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −2400%	75 +2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −856%	85−90 +856%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −886%	69 +886%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1038%	90−95 +1038%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −765%	190−200 +765%
Hitman 3	9−10 −1011%	100 +1011%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −481%	157 +481%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −1120%	183 +1120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −519%	99 +519%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −45.2%	61 +45.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−870%

95−100
+870%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −1086%	80−85 +1086%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −983%	65−70 +983%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1467%	45−50 +1467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1567%	50−55 +1567%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1900%	40 +1900%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1125%	45−50 +1125%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −5775%	230−240 +5775%
Hitman 3	8−9 −738%	67 +738%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −1189%	116 +1189%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −2033%	60−65 +2033%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −742%	200−210 +742%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

−825%

70−75
+825%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −2050%	40−45 +2050%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −1750%	35−40 +1750%
Hitman 3	0−1	33
Metro Exodus	0−1	55−60

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −1300%	28 +1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −2700%	27−30 +2700%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	14
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1150%	24−27 +1150%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −2900%	60−65 +2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −2300%	24 +2300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−680%

35−40
+680%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	56 +0%	56 +0%
Metro Exodus	98 +0%	98 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	118 +0%	118 +0%

4K
High Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	54 +0%	54 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

+0%

This is how Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6600 XT is 1025% faster in 1080p
RX 6600 XT is 1000% faster in 1440p
RX 6600 XT is 1333% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 5775% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6600 XT is ahead in 63 tests (91%)
there's a draw in 6 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.95	42.80
Recency	5 September 2014	30 July 2021
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	160 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has 966.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6600 XT, on the other hand, has a 983.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.