NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

#ad
Buy
VS

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking655619
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.321.65
ArchitectureGen. 8 Broadwell (2014−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3eN14E-GL
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 June 2015 (8 years old)30 May 2013 (10 years old)
Current price$645 $163
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 760M has 416% better value for money than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48768
CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed300 MHz657 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz657 MHz
Number of transistors189 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate40.8042.05
Floating-point performance883.2 gflops1,009 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and GeForce GTX 760M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
SLI optionsno data+

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Standard memory configurationno dataGDDR5
Memory bus widtheDRAM + 64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
LVDS signal supportno dataUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportno dataUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
HDMIno data+
HDCP content protectionno data+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMIno data+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreamingno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Supportno data+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoderno data+
Optimusno data+
3D Vision / 3DTV Playno data+
Quick Sync+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 API
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.44.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.1.801.1.126
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Pro Graphics 6200
3.90

GeForce GTX 760M outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 by 14% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 1523
GTX 760M 1717
+12.7%

GeForce GTX 760M outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 by 13% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 2766
GTX 760M 3369
+21.8%

GeForce GTX 760M outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 by 22% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 1737
GTX 760M 2271
+30.8%

GeForce GTX 760M outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 by 31% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 15388
GTX 760M 15900
+3.3%

GeForce GTX 760M outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 by 3% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p30−35
−30%
39
+30%
Full HD35−40
−25.7%
44
+25.7%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2
Battlefield 5 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Hitman 3 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2
Battlefield 5 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Hitman 3 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2
Battlefield 5 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Hitman 3 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

This is how Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and GTX 760M compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • GTX 760M is 30% faster than Iris Pro Graphics 6200

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 760M is 25.7% faster than Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 760M is 200% faster than the Iris Pro Graphics 6200.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 760M is ahead in 41 test (76%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (24%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 3.90 4.43
Recency 2 June 2015 30 May 2013
Maximum RAM amount System Shared 2 GB
Pipelines / CUDA cores 48 768
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 55 Watt

The GeForce GTX 760M is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GeForce GTX 760M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 74 votes

Rate Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 95 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.