Radeon PRO W7700 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580

Place in performance ranking	610	45
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.14	24.81
Architecture	Gen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	Skylake GT4e	Navi 32
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	1 September 2015 (8 years ago)	13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999
Current price	$2427	$999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7700 has 17621% better value for money than Iris Pro Graphics 580.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	72	3072
Core clock speed	350 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	72.00	499.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Radeon PRO W7700 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	eDRAM + 64/128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	no data	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort 2.1

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.2
Vulkan	1.1.97	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Pro Graphics 580 4.77

PRO W7700 51.83
+987%

Radeon PRO W7700 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 580 by 987% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Iris Pro Graphics 580 1841

PRO W7700 20016
+987%

Radeon PRO W7700 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 580 by 987% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−956%

190−200
+956%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8−9

−963%

85−90
+963%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −983%	130−140 +983%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −977%	140−150 +977%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −945%	230−240 +945%
Hitman 3	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −980%	270−280 +980%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −977%	140−150 +977%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −959%	180−190 +959%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −945%	230−240 +945%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −983%	130−140 +983%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −977%	140−150 +977%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −945%	230−240 +945%
Hitman 3	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −980%	270−280 +980%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −977%	140−150 +977%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −959%	180−190 +959%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −900%	110−120 +900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −945%	230−240 +945%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −945%	230−240 +945%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −980%	270−280 +980%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −959%	180−190 +959%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −900%	110−120 +900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −945%	230−240 +945%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−977%

140−150
+977%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −983%	65−70 +983%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Hitman 3	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −900%	110−120 +900%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10

−956%

95−100
+956%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Hitman 3	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −900%	50−55 +900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −900%	50−55 +900%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −983%	65−70 +983%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−900%

50−55
+900%

This is how Iris Pro Graphics 580 and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

PRO W7700 is 956% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.77	51.83
Recency	1 September 2015	13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	190 Watt