ATI Radeon 9000 LE vs Iris Pro Graphics 580

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking713not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.59no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameSkylake GT4eRV250
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores576no data
Core clock speed350 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate68.401.000
Floating-point processing power1.094 TFLOPSno data
ROPs94
TMUs724

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4DDR
Maximum RAM amount64 GB64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 28 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics 580 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 971.4% more advanced lithography process, and 86.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Radeon 9000 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9000 LE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 18 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9000 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics 580 or Radeon 9000 LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.