GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking706not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.53no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameSkylake GT4eGM206
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)17 November 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores576512
Core clock speed350 MHz1087 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1239 MHz
Number of transistors189 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate68.4039.65
Floating-point processing power1.094 TFLOPS1.269 TFLOPS
ROPs932
TMUs7232
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 GB2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.19 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 17 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

Iris Pro Graphics 580 has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 750 GM206, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and GeForce GTX 750 GM206. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 750 GM206 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Iris Pro Graphics 580
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206
GeForce GTX 750 GM206

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 18 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 14 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 GM206 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics 580 or GeForce GTX 750 GM206, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.