T400 vs GeForce GTX 675M

Place in the ranking	636	475
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.45	21.54
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GF114	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	22 March 2012 (12 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	384
Core clock speed	620 MHz	420 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	1,950 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	39.68	34.20
Floating-point processing power	0.9523 TFLOPS	1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	64	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96.0 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	3x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 675M 4.82

T400 9.03
+87.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 675M 1927

T400 3610
+87.3%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 675M 6362

T400 16982
+167%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	48 −77.1%	85−90 +77.1%
Full HD	48 −77.1%	85−90 +77.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −84.6%	24−27 +84.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −84.6%	24−27 +84.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%
Valorant	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −84.6%	24−27 +84.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Dota 2	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −66.7%	40−45 +66.7%
Fortnite	27−30 −72.4%	50−55 +72.4%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −86%	80−85 +86%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Valorant	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
World of Tanks	102 −86.3%	190−200 +86.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −84.6%	24−27 +84.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Dota 2	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −66.7%	40−45 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −86%	80−85 +86%
Valorant	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Grand Theft Auto V	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −81.8%	60−65 +81.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
World of Tanks	35−40 −80.6%	65−70 +80.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Counter-Strike 2	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Valorant	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Dota 2	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Dota 2	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Fortnite	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Valorant	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%

This is how GTX 675M and T400 compete in popular games:

T400 is 77% faster in 900p
T400 is 77% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.82	9.03
Recency	22 March 2012	6 May 2021
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	30 Watt

T400 has a 87.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The T400 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 675M is a notebook card while T400 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.