ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013
System shared System shared + 128 MB eDRAM, 45 Watt
3.07
+86.1%

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4850 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking770951
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.04no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameHaswell GT3eM98
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date27 May 2013 (11 years ago)9 January 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320800
Core clock speed200 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate48.0020.00
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS0.8 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs4040

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem shared + 128 MB eDRAMGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared850 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data54.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.33.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 3.07
+86.1%
ATI Mobility HD 4850 1.65

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 8692
+65.1%
ATI Mobility HD 4850 5264

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−117%
39
+117%
4K7
+133%
3−4
−133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Elden Ring 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Valorant 1−2 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Dota 2 3
+50%
2−3
−50%
Elden Ring 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Fortnite 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Grand Theft Auto V 5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+64.7%
16−18
−64.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 1−2 0−1
World of Tanks 52
+57.6%
30−35
−57.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Dota 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+64.7%
16−18
−64.7%
Valorant 1−2 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 1−2 0−1
Elden Ring 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
World of Tanks 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Valorant 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Elden Ring 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Valorant 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and ATI Mobility HD 4850 compete in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 4850 is 117% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is 133% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is ahead in 42 tests (88%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (13%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.07 1.65
Recency 27 May 2013 9 January 2009
Chip lithography 22 nm 55 nm

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has a 86.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850
Mobility Radeon HD 4850

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 164 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.