UHD Graphics P750 vs Iris Plus Graphics
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Iris Plus Graphics and UHD Graphics P750, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Plus Graphics outperforms Graphics P750 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 706 | 710 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 21.77 | 21.40 |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) |
| GPU code name | Ice Lake GT2 | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | no data | 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 83.20 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.024 TFLOPS | 0.6656 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 32 |
| TMUs | 32 | 64 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | Ring Bus |
| Width | IGP | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | System Shared |
| Shared memory | no data | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Motherboard Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.05 | 3.98 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Iris Plus Graphics has a 1.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Iris Plus Graphics and UHD Graphics P750.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
