Radeon 620 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
2019
12 Watt
5.54
+139%

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) outperforms Radeon 620 by a whopping 139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking571814
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.34
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameIce Lake G7 Gen. 11Polaris 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date28 May 2019 (5 years ago)12 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Current priceno data$67

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64384
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1024 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data24.58

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and Radeon 620 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkanno data1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 5.54
+139%
Radeon 620 2.32

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) outperforms Radeon 620 by 139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 2743
+58.6%
Radeon 620 1730

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) outperforms Radeon 620 by 59% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+157%
7−8
−157%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 9
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Hitman 3 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24
+60%
14−16
−60%
Metro Exodus 18 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 12
+140%
5−6
−140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 16
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Hitman 3 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Horizon Zero Dawn 17
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 10
+100%
5−6
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+200%
6−7
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Horizon Zero Dawn 11
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+50%
6−7
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Hitman 3 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hitman 3 2−3 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and Radeon 620 compete in popular games:

  • Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 157% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 700% faster.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 620 is 36% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is ahead in 49 tests (96%)
  • Radeon 620 is ahead in 2 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.54 2.32
Recency 28 May 2019 12 August 2019
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 50 Watt

The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
AMD Radeon 620
Radeon 620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 232 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 65 votes

Rate Radeon 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.