Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) with Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB, including specs and performance data.

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
2019
12 Watt
3.71

RX 9060 XT 16 GB outperforms Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) by a whopping 1196% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking73974
Place by popularitynot in top-10070
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data81.76
Power efficiency11.3122.89
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameIce Lake G4 Gen. 11Navi 44
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 May 2019 (6 years ago)4 June 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482048
Core clock speed300 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz3130 MHz
Number of transistorsno data29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rateno data400.6
Floating-point processing powerno data25.64 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data322.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−1194%
220−230
+1194%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.59

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
God of War 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14
−1186%
180−190
+1186%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Far Cry 5 11
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Fortnite 12
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1178%
230−240
+1178%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
God of War 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1150%
200−210
+1150%
Valorant 50−55
−1150%
650−700
+1150%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 13
−1131%
160−170
+1131%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 37
−1116%
450−500
+1116%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Dota 2 18
−1178%
230−240
+1178%
Far Cry 5 10
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Fortnite 12
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1178%
230−240
+1178%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
God of War 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1150%
200−210
+1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−1131%
160−170
+1131%
Valorant 50−55
−1150%
650−700
+1150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Dota 2 20
−1150%
250−260
+1150%
Far Cry 5 9
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1178%
230−240
+1178%
God of War 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1150%
200−210
+1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Valorant 50−55
−1150%
650−700
+1150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7
−1186%
90−95
+1186%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−1150%
350−400
+1150%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−1190%
400−450
+1190%
Valorant 35−40
−1182%
500−550
+1182%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
God of War 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1150%
200−210
+1150%
Valorant 18−20
−1163%
240−250
+1163%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 12−14
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
God of War 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) and RX 9060 XT 16 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT 16 GB is 1194% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.71 48.08
Recency 28 May 2019 4 June 2025
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 160 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

RX 9060 XT 16 GB, on the other hand, has a 1196% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 57 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 369 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) or Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.