GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) and GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
2019
12 Watt
3.71

RTX 5080 Mobile outperforms Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) by a whopping 1786% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking71214
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.0465.08
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameIce Lake G4 Gen. 11GB203
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date28 May 2019 (5 years ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores487680
Core clock speed300 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rateno data360.0
Floating-point processing powerno data23.04 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data896.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−1665%
300−350
+1665%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−1757%
260−270
+1757%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1775%
150−160
+1775%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−1775%
150−160
+1775%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14
−1757%
260−270
+1757%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−1757%
260−270
+1757%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1775%
150−160
+1775%
Far Cry 5 11
−1718%
200−210
+1718%
Fortnite 12
−1733%
220−230
+1733%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1567%
300−310
+1567%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−1678%
160−170
+1678%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−1775%
150−160
+1775%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1775%
300−310
+1775%
Valorant 50−55
−1692%
950−1000
+1692%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 13
−1746%
240−250
+1746%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−1757%
260−270
+1757%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 37
−1657%
650−700
+1657%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1775%
150−160
+1775%
Dota 2 18
−1567%
300−310
+1567%
Far Cry 5 10
−1700%
180−190
+1700%
Fortnite 12
−1733%
220−230
+1733%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1567%
300−310
+1567%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−1678%
160−170
+1678%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−1678%
160−170
+1678%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−1775%
150−160
+1775%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−1757%
130−140
+1757%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1775%
300−310
+1775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−1746%
240−250
+1746%
Valorant 50−55
−1692%
950−1000
+1692%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12
−1733%
220−230
+1733%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1775%
150−160
+1775%
Dota 2 20
−1650%
350−400
+1650%
Far Cry 5 9
−1678%
160−170
+1678%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1567%
300−310
+1567%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−1775%
150−160
+1775%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1775%
300−310
+1775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−1757%
130−140
+1757%
Valorant 50−55
−1692%
950−1000
+1692%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7
−1757%
130−140
+1757%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−1624%
500−550
+1624%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−1674%
550−600
+1674%
Valorant 40−45
−1775%
750−800
+1775%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−1678%
160−170
+1678%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−1775%
75−80
+1775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−1757%
130−140
+1757%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1775%
300−310
+1775%
Valorant 18−20
−1742%
350−400
+1742%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Dota 2 12−14
−1733%
220−230
+1733%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1775%
75−80
+1775%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−1775%
75−80
+1775%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−1775%
75−80
+1775%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) and RTX 5080 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5080 Mobile is 1665% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.71 69.97
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 80 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) has 566.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 5080 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1786% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5080

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 57 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 21 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) or GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.