Tesla C870 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking732not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.20no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT3eG80
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 April 2018 (8 years ago)2 May 2007 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384128
Core clock speed300 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt171 Watt
Texture fill rate50.4038.40
Floating-point processing power0.8064 TFLOPS0.3456 TFLOPS
ROPs624
TMUs4832
L2 Cacheno data96 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1536 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2018 2 May 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 171 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 655 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 543% more advanced lithography process, and 1040% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Tesla C870. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla C870 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 371 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 655 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla C870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics 655 or Tesla C870, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.