ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3410 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking732not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.20no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT3eM82
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 April 2018 (8 years ago)25 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38440
Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate50.401.600
Floating-point processing power0.8064 TFLOPS0.032 TFLOPS
ROPs64
TMUs484
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusMXM-II

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2018 25 July 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 7 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 655 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 3410, on the other hand, has 114% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Mobility Radeon HD 3410. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 370 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 655 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics 655 or Mobility Radeon HD 3410, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.