Radeon Instinct MI300X vs Iris Plus Graphics 650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking618not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.67no data
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)CDNA 3.0
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT3eAqua Vanjaram
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price$949 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4819456
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1100 MHz2100 MHz
Number of transistors189 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate55.202,554
Floating-point performance883 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon Instinct MI300X compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4HBM3
Maximum RAM amount32 GB192 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared5 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data5,171 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.1.103N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2017 6 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 192 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 750 Watt

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon Instinct MI300X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a notebook card while Radeon Instinct MI300X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Plus Graphics 650
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X
Radeon Instinct MI300X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 95 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 43 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.