ATI All-In-Wonder X1900 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking718not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.49no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT3eR580
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2017 (8 years ago)13 January 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed300 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million384 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate55.208.000
Floating-point processing power0.8832 TFLOPSno data
ROPs616
TMUs4816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 GB256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared477 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data30.53 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2017 13 January 2006
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm

Iris Plus Graphics 650 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and All-In-Wonder X1900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder X1900 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Plus Graphics 650
ATI All-In-Wonder X1900
All-In-Wonder X1900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 99 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate All-In-Wonder X1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics 650 or All-In-Wonder X1900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.