Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Iris Graphics 6100

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Graphics 6100 with Iris Pro Graphics P6300, including specs and performance data.

Iris Graphics 6100
2015
15 Watt
2.30

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 outperforms Iris Graphics 6100 by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking857692
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.6919.06
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3Broadwell GT3e
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2015 (10 years ago)5 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors189 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate48.0038.40
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs66
TMUs4848

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusIGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan+1.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Graphics 6100 2.30
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 4.10
+78.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Graphics 6100 896
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 1596
+78.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Dota 2 7
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Fortnite 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12
−75%
21−24
+75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Valorant 0−1 0−1
World of Tanks 33
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Dota 2 18
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
World of Tanks 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Valorant 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Dota 2 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Valorant 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

This is how Iris Graphics 6100 and Iris Pro Graphics P6300 compete in popular games:

  • Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is 62% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.30 4.10

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has a 78.3% higher aggregate performance score.

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Graphics 6100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Graphics 6100 is a notebook card while Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Graphics 6100
Iris Graphics 6100
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 133 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 13 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.