Radeon Pro 5300M vs Ice Lake GT3e

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated408
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.60
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT3eNavi 14
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release dateno data13 November 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121280
Core clock speedno data1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1250 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data85 Watt
Texture fill rateno data100.0
Floating-point processing powerno data3.2 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3280
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm

Pro 5300M has a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ice Lake GT3e and Radeon Pro 5300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ice Lake GT3e is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Ice Lake GT3e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 198 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Ice Lake GT3e or Radeon Pro 5300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.