Radeon Sky 500 vs ION 2

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared ION 2 with Radeon Sky 500, including specs and performance data.

ION 2
2008
20 Watt
0.33

Sky 500 outperforms ION 2 by a whopping 3603% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1305404
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.135.58
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGT218Pitcairn
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)27 March 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161280
Core clock speed500 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors260 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00076.00
Floating-point processing power0.03424 TFLOPS2.432 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data154 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort countno data1
Dual-link DVI support-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3400%
140−150
+3400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3525%
290−300
+3525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−3400%
140−150
+3400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−3471%
1000−1050
+3471%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3400%
140−150
+3400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3525%
290−300
+3525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−3400%
140−150
+3400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−3233%
300−310
+3233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−3471%
1000−1050
+3471%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3400%
140−150
+3400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3525%
290−300
+3525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−3400%
140−150
+3400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−3233%
300−310
+3233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−3471%
1000−1050
+3471%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−3567%
220−230
+3567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 12.22
Recency 3 June 2008 27 March 2013
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 150 Watt

ION 2 has 650% lower power consumption.

Sky 500, on the other hand, has a 3603% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Sky 500 is our recommended choice as it beats the ION 2 in performance tests.

Be aware that ION 2 is a notebook card while Radeon Sky 500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA ION 2
ION 2
AMD Radeon Sky 500
Radeon Sky 500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 25 votes

Rate ION 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 15 votes

Rate Radeon Sky 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.