Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB vs ION 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared ION 2 with Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB, including specs and performance data.

ION 2
2008
20 Watt
0.30

9060 XT 8 GB outperforms ION 2 by a whopping 15690% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking139181
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data95.03
Power efficiency1.1624.32
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGT218Navi 44
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)4 June 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162048
Core clock speed500 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data3130 MHz
Number of transistors260 million29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000400.6
Floating-point processing power0.03424 TFLOPS25.64 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache32 KB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data322.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−15614%
1100−1150
+15614%
Valorant 24−27
−15669%
4100−4150
+15669%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−15614%
2200−2250
+15614%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
Dota 2 9−10
−15456%
1400−1450
+15456%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−15614%
1100−1150
+15614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−14900%
750−800
+14900%
Valorant 24−27
−15669%
4100−4150
+15669%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
Dota 2 9−10
−15456%
1400−1450
+15456%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−15614%
1100−1150
+15614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−14900%
750−800
+14900%
Valorant 24−27
−15669%
4100−4150
+15669%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−15614%
2200−2250
+15614%
Valorant 2−3
−14900%
300−310
+14900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−14900%
300−310
+14900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 47.37
Recency 3 June 2008 4 June 2025
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 150 Watt

ION 2 has 650% lower power consumption.

RX 9060 XT 8 GB, on the other hand, has a 15690% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the ION 2 in performance tests.

Be aware that ION 2 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 27 votes

Rate ION 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 481 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about ION 2 or Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.