GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs ION 2

Place in the ranking	1305	7
Place by popularity	not in top-100	89
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	48.84
Power efficiency	1.13	19.83
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GT218	AD103
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	3 June 2008 (16 years ago)	8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	8448
Core clock speed	500 MHz	2340 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2610 MHz
Number of transistors	260 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.000	689.0
Floating-point processing power	0.03424 TFLOPS	44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	96
TMUs	8	264
Tensor Cores	no data	264
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	66

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	310 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	16 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	672.3 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.7
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	1.2	8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	0−1	229
1440p	0−1	153
4K	-0−1	95

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.49
1440p	no data	5.22
4K	no data	8.41

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−24900%

500−550
+24900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −5500%	160−170 +5500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −5900%	120−130 +5900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −24900%	500−550 +24900%
Hitman 3	4−5 −3125%	120−130 +3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −3538%	290−300 +3538%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −8900%	350−400 +8900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −450%	150−160 +450%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −5500%	160−170 +5500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −5900%	120−130 +5900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −24900%	500−550 +24900%
Hitman 3	4−5 −3125%	120−130 +3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −3538%	290−300 +3538%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −10950%	442 +10950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1933%	180−190 +1933%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −450%	150−160 +450%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −5500%	160−170 +5500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −5900%	120−130 +5900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −24900%	500−550 +24900%
Hitman 3	4−5 −3125%	120−130 +3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −3538%	290−300 +3538%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −10075%	407 +10075%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −2233%	210 +2233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −414%	144 +414%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −1900%	120−130 +1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −11000%	220−230 +11000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−6200%

120−130
+6200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −7100%	70−75 +7100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	65−70

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−4850%

95−100
+4850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +0%	250−260 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +0%	250−260 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +0%	250−260 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+0%

120−130

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	306 +0%	306 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	159 +0%	159 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Hitman 3	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	162 +0%	162 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	69 +0%	69 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 11000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is ahead in 25 tests (38%)
there's a draw in 40 tests (62%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.33	82.50
Recency	3 June 2008	8 January 2024
Chip lithography	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	285 Watt

ION 2 has 1325% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, on the other hand, has a 24900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the ION 2 in performance tests.

Be aware that ION 2 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.