Radeon RX 7600M XT vs HD Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics with Radeon RX 7600M XT, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics
2012
35 Watt
0.74

RX 7600M XT outperforms HD Graphics by a whopping 4339% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1158151
Place by popularity69not in top-100
Power efficiency1.5319.75
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1Navi 33
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 April 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482048
Core clock speed650 MHz1280 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz2469 MHz
Number of transistors392 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate6.300316.0
Floating-point processing power0.1008 TFLOPS20.23 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs6128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.801.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 0.74
RX 7600M XT 32.85
+4339%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 298
RX 7600M XT 13231
+4340%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD Graphics 300
RX 7600M XT 28686
+9462%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−5800%
118
+5800%
1440p1−2
−5600%
57
+5600%
4K0−133

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 105
+0%
105
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 255
+0%
255
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 109
+0%
109
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 82
+0%
82
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 89
+0%
89
+0%
Far Cry 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 208
+0%
208
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 132
+0%
132
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 73
+0%
73
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180
+0%
180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 70
+0%
70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
+0%
69
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
World of Tanks 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120
+0%
120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 92
+0%
92
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+0%
74
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1
+0%
1
+0%
Dota 2 74
+0%
74
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 74
+0%
74
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+0%
74
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 22
+0%
22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 64
+0%
64
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how HD Graphics and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is 5800% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600M XT is 5600% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 32.85
Recency 1 April 2012 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 22 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 120 Watt

HD Graphics has 242.9% lower power consumption.

RX 7600M XT, on the other hand, has a 4339.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 266.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics is a desktop card while Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics
HD Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 2250 votes

Rate HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 75 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.