Radeon RX 7400 vs HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) with Radeon RX 7400, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
2011
0.33

RX 7400 outperforms HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) by a whopping 8585% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1359224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data51.19
ArchitectureGen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameSandy BridgeNavi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2011 (14 years ago)8 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61792
Core clock speed350 MHz1452 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data43 Watt
Texture fill rateno data257.6
Floating-point processing powerno data16.49 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7
−8471%
600−650
+8471%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−8471%
600−650
+8471%
Valorant 24−27
−8554%
2250−2300
+8554%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10
−8400%
850−900
+8400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%
Dota 2 10−11
−8400%
850−900
+8400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−8471%
600−650
+8471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
Valorant 24−27
−8554%
2250−2300
+8554%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%
Dota 2 10−11
−8400%
850−900
+8400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−8471%
600−650
+8471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
Valorant 24−27
−8554%
2250−2300
+8554%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−8567%
260−270
+8567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−8471%
1200−1250
+8471%
Valorant 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%

This is how HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) and RX 7400 compete in popular games:

  • RX 7400 is 8471% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 28.66
Recency 1 May 2011 8 August 2025
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm

RX 7400 has a 8584.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 433.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7400 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 7400 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
AMD Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 98 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 23 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) or Radeon RX 7400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.