Radeon HD 6450 vs HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) with Radeon HD 6450, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
2011
0.34

HD 6450 outperforms HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13831319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.05
ArchitectureGen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameSandy BridgeCaicos
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date1 May 2011 (15 years ago)7 April 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$55

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6160
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1100 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistorsno data370 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt
Texture fill rateno data5.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.0 x8
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data8.5-12.8 GB/x (DDR3) or 25.6-28.8 GB/s (GDDR5)
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Eyefinity-+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data4
HDMI-+
DisplayPort support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1DirectX® 11
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data6.11

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Valorant 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10
−40%
14−16
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Valorant 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Valorant 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Valorant 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) and HD 6450 compete in popular games:

  • HD 6450 is 29% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 0.48
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm

HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) has a 25% more advanced lithography process.

HD 6450, on the other hand, has a 41% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon HD 6450 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 6450 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 102 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 602 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) or Radeon HD 6450, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.