ATI Radeon HD 5470 vs HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) with Radeon HD 5470, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
2011
0.33

HD 5470 outperforms HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13631249
Place by popularity62not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.59
ArchitectureGen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameSandy BridgeCedar
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2011 (14 years ago)13 February 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores680
Core clock speed350 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data292 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data19 Watt
Texture fill rateno data5.200
Floating-point processing powerno data0.104 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Valorant 24−27
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10
−80%
18−20
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Valorant 24−27
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Valorant 24−27
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Valorant 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

This is how HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) and ATI HD 5470 compete in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5470 is 71% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 0.64
Recency 1 May 2011 13 February 2012
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm

HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) has a 25% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 5470, on the other hand, has a 93.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 9 months.

The Radeon HD 5470 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 5470 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
ATI Radeon HD 5470
Radeon HD 5470

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 101 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 45 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) or Radeon HD 5470, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.