GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) and GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RTX 4080 Mobile outperforms HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) by a whopping 18879% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1338 | 40 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 40.30 |
| Architecture | Gen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | Sandy Bridge | AD104 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 May 2011 (14 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 6 | 7424 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 35,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 110 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 386.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 24.72 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 80 |
| TMUs | no data | 232 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 232 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 58 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 432.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 7
−2100%
| 154
+2100%
|
| 1440p | 0−1 | 104 |
| 4K | -0−1 | 68 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 4−5
−5625%
|
229
+5625%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−14800%
|
149
+14800%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 4−5
−4300%
|
176
+4300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−14200%
|
143
+14200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−7700%
|
230−240
+7700%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−2414%
|
170−180
+2414%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−1181%
|
300−350
+1181%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 4−5
−3900%
|
160
+3900%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 10
−2680%
|
270−280
+2680%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−12300%
|
124
+12300%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−11
−1680%
|
178
+1680%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−7700%
|
230−240
+7700%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 146 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−2414%
|
170−180
+2414%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−6580%
|
334
+6580%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−1181%
|
300−350
+1181%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 4−5
−3650%
|
150
+3650%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−12000%
|
121
+12000%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−11
−1550%
|
165
+1550%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−7700%
|
230−240
+7700%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−2414%
|
170−180
+2414%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−3340%
|
172
+3340%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−1181%
|
300−350
+1181%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−8650%
|
170−180
+8650%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 82 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−19700%
|
190−200
+19700%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 0−1 | 150−160 |
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−800%
|
144
+800%
|
| Valorant | 2−3
−16700%
|
336
+16700%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−4700%
|
95−100
+4700%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−3850%
|
75−80
+3850%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 215
+0%
|
215
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 171
+0%
|
171
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 280−290
+0%
|
280−290
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 196
+0%
|
196
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 161
+0%
|
161
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 280−290
+0%
|
280−290
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 157
+0%
|
157
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 151
+0%
|
151
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 280−290
+0%
|
280−290
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 149
+0%
|
149
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 450−500
+0%
|
450−500
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 122
+0%
|
122
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 102
+0%
|
102
+0%
|
| Valorant | 350−400
+0%
|
350−400
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 112
+0%
|
112
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 140
+0%
|
140
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 140
+0%
|
140
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 98
+0%
|
98
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 71
+0%
|
71
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 67
+0%
|
67
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 117
+0%
|
117
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 65
+0%
|
65
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 39
+0%
|
39
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 157
+0%
|
157
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 91
+0%
|
91
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
This is how HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) and RTX 4080 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 4080 Mobile is 2100% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4080 Mobile is 19700% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 4080 Mobile is ahead in 28 tests (44%)
- there's a draw in 35 tests (56%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.33 | 62.63 |
| Recency | 1 May 2011 | 3 January 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
RTX 4080 Mobile has a 18878.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
