Radeon PRO V710 vs HD Graphics P630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking755not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.29no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 August 2016 (8 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1923456
Core clock speed350 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors189 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40432.0
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs396
TMUs24216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1740 MB28 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared224 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.1.1031.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 August 2016 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 1740 MB 28 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 158 Watt

HD Graphics P630 has 953.3% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1547.8% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics P630 and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics P630 is a desktop card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics P630
HD Graphics P630
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 19 votes

Rate HD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.