UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) vs HD Graphics P530
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD Graphics P530 with UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), including specs and performance data.
Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) outperforms HD Graphics P530 by a whopping 163% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 860 | 598 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 13.16 | no data |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) |
| GPU code name | Skylake GT2 | Alder Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 (10 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 64 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 189 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm+ | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 18.40 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.4416 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 3 | no data |
| TMUs | 16 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | no data |
| Width | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | no data |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.1.97 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 7−8
−200%
| 21
+200%
|
| 1440p | 4−5
−175%
| 11
+175%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−386%
|
30−35
+386%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−260%
|
18
+260%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−275%
|
30−33
+275%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−386%
|
30−35
+386%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−200%
|
15
+200%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 9−10
−200%
|
27−30
+200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−157%
|
18
+157%
|
| Fortnite | 12−14
−215%
|
40−45
+215%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−138%
|
30−35
+138%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 6−7
−317%
|
25
+317%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−92.3%
|
24−27
+92.3%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−68.2%
|
70−75
+68.2%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−275%
|
30−33
+275%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−386%
|
30−35
+386%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 50−55
−122%
|
110−120
+122%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−120%
|
11
+120%
|
| Dota 2 | 24−27
−104%
|
53
+104%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 9−10
−200%
|
27−30
+200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−171%
|
19
+171%
|
| Fortnite | 12−14
−215%
|
40−45
+215%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−138%
|
30−35
+138%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 6−7
−267%
|
22
+267%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6−7
−100%
|
12
+100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
−175%
|
11
+175%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−92.3%
|
24−27
+92.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−156%
|
23
+156%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−68.2%
|
70−75
+68.2%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−275%
|
30−33
+275%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−180%
|
14−16
+180%
|
| Dota 2 | 24−27
−88.5%
|
49
+88.5%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 9−10
−200%
|
27−30
+200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−157%
|
18
+157%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−138%
|
30−35
+138%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−92.3%
|
24−27
+92.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−22.2%
|
11
+22.2%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+100%
|
22
−100%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 12−14
−215%
|
40−45
+215%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
−117%
|
12−14
+117%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 18−20
−174%
|
50−55
+174%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
−66.7%
|
40−45
+66.7%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−235%
|
75−80
+235%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 5−6
−160%
|
12−14
+160%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−250%
|
14
+250%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−167%
|
16−18
+167%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−125%
|
9−10
+125%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 5−6
−180%
|
14−16
+180%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−20%
|
18−20
+20%
|
| Valorant | 12−14
−169%
|
35−40
+169%
|
4K
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| Dota 2 | 7−8
−257%
|
24−27
+257%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−450%
|
10−12
+450%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−133%
|
7−8
+133%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−133%
|
7−8
+133%
|
1440p
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6
+0%
|
6
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
This is how HD Graphics P530 and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is 200% faster in 1080p
- UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is 175% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD Graphics P530 is 100% faster.
- in Far Cry 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is 500% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- HD Graphics P530 performs better in 1 test (2%)
- UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) performs better in 54 tests (90%)
- there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.57 | 6.75 |
| Recency | 1 September 2015 | 4 January 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) has a 162.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P530 in performance tests.
Be aware that HD Graphics P530 is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
