ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5830 vs HD Graphics P530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Apollo Lake GT1 5 P530 Iris Pro Graphics P555
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5145 5165 5430 5450 5470 5570 5650 5670 Mac Edition 5730 5750 5770 5830 5850 5850 Mac Edition 5870 5870 Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics P530 with Mobility Radeon HD 5830, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics P530
2015
1740 MB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
2.57
+109%

HD Graphics P530 outperforms Mobility HD 5830 by a whopping 109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
HD Graphics P530 HD Graphics P530
ATI Mobility HD 5830 Mobility HD 5830

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8671094
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.193.95
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2Broadway
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)7 January 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192800
Core clock speed350 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt24 Watt
Texture fill rate18.4020.00
Floating-point processing power0.4416 TFLOPS0.8 TFLOPS
ROPs316
TMUs1640
L1 Cacheno data80 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1740 MB1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.1.97N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 3−4 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Fortnite 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Valorant 40−45
+33.3%
30−35
−33.3%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+72.4%
27−30
−72.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 24−27
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Fortnite 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Valorant 40−45
+33.3%
30−35
−33.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 24−27
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Valorant 40−45
+33.3%
30−35
−33.3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+84.6%
12−14
−84.6%
Valorant 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Valorant 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD Graphics P530 is 700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, HD Graphics P530 surpassed ATI Mobility HD 5830 in all 43 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.57 1.23
Recency 1 September 2015 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 1740 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 24 Watt

HD Graphics P530 has a 109% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 70% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 186% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics P530 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5830 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics P530 is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 5830 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD Graphics P530 HD Graphics P530
vs
UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 710
ATI Mobility HD 5830 Mobility Radeon HD 5830
vs
9800M GS GeForce 9800M GS
HD Graphics P530 HD Graphics P530
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
HD Graphics 530 Intel Graphics 530
vs
ATI Graphics Ultra Pro PCI PCI
HD Graphics 530 Intel Graphics 530
vs
FX 5700 VE 5700 VE
HD Graphics 530 Intel Graphics 530
vs
FX 350 350
HD Graphics 530 Intel Graphics 530
vs
NVS 280 PCIe 280 PCIe
HD Graphics 530 Intel Graphics 530
vs
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 4500 Ada Generation
HD Graphics P530 Intel Graphics P530
vs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M 4500M
HD Graphics P530 Intel Graphics P530
vs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 3600
HD Graphics P530 Intel Graphics P530
vs
HD Graphics P4700 P4700
HD Graphics P530 Intel Graphics P530
vs
Radeon 620 620
HD Graphics P530 Intel Graphics P530
vs
RX Vega 2 Vega 2

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.5 28 votes

Rate HD Graphics P530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics P530 or Mobility Radeon HD 5830, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.