HD Graphics 630 vs HD Graphics P530

Place in performance ranking	759	718
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.11	0.09
Architecture	Gen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)
GPU code name	Skylake GT2	Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 September 2015 (8 years ago)	1 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Current price	$895	$370

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD Graphics P530 has 22% better value for money than HD Graphics 630.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	24	24
Core clock speed	350 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	1150 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	18.40	26.40
Floating-point performance	no data	441.6 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on HD Graphics P530 and HD Graphics 630 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x1
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount	1740 MB	64 GB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.97	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics P530 2.77

HD Graphics 630 3.09
+11.6%

HD Graphics 630 outperforms HD Graphics P530 by 12% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics P530 1074

HD Graphics 630 1197
+11.5%

HD Graphics 630 outperforms HD Graphics P530 by 11% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	12−14 −25%	15 +25%
1440p	55−60 −16.4%	64 +16.4%
4K	10−12 −30%	13 +30%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−20%

6−7
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −25%	5 +25%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −50%	6 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −25%	5 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Hitman 3	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +80%	5 −80%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Hitman 3	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +100%	2 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Hitman 3	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	1−2
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Hitman 3	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

This is how HD Graphics P530 and HD Graphics 630 compete in popular games:

HD Graphics 630 is 25% faster than HD Graphics P530 in 1080p
HD Graphics 630 is 16.4% faster than HD Graphics P530 in 1440p
HD Graphics 630 is 30% faster than HD Graphics P530 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD Graphics P530 is 100% faster than the HD Graphics 630.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD Graphics 630 is 100% faster than the HD Graphics P530.

All in all, in popular games: