GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs HD Graphics P530

Place in the ranking	801	4
Place by popularity	not in top-100	55
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	38.35
Power efficiency	12.83	19.19
Architecture	Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Skylake GT2	AD103
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	1 September 2015 (9 years ago)	8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	10240
Core clock speed	350 MHz	2295 MHz
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	2550 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	320 Watt
Texture fill rate	18.40	816.0
Floating-point processing power	0.4416 TFLOPS	52.22 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	112
TMUs	16	320
Tensor Cores	no data	320
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	310 mm
Width	IGP	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	1740 MB	16 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1438 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	736.3 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.97	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics P530 2.79

RTX 4080 SUPER 89.06
+3092%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics P530 1074

RTX 4080 SUPER 34229
+3087%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	8−9 −3163%	261 +3163%
1440p	5−6 −3460%	178 +3460%
4K	3−4 −3800%	117 +3800%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.83
1440p	no data	5.61
4K	no data	8.54

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −2975%	246 +2975%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −3043%	220−230 +3043%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −1571%	110−120 +1571%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −2900%	240 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −3043%	220−230 +3043%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −4286%	614 +4286%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 −12450%	250−260 +12450%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −3860%	198 +3860%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −1460%	150−160 +1460%
Valorant	3−4 −19433%	550−600 +19433%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −1571%	110−120 +1571%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −2575%	214 +2575%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −3043%	220−230 +3043%
Dota 2	7−8 −2457%	179 +2457%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −906%	161 +906%
Fortnite	14−16 −1953%	300−350 +1953%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −3957%	568 +3957%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 −12450%	250−260 +12450%
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8 −2457%	179 +2457%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −3660%	188 +3660%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −727%	210−220 +727%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −1460%	150−160 +1460%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −1482%	170−180 +1482%
Valorant	3−4 −19433%	550−600 +19433%
World of Tanks	50−55 −458%	270−280 +458%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −1571%	110−120 +1571%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −2275%	190 +2275%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −3043%	220−230 +3043%
Dota 2	7−8 −3043%	220−230 +3043%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −994%	170−180 +994%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −3664%	527 +3664%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 −12450%	250−260 +12450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −727%	210−220 +727%
Valorant	3−4 −19433%	550−600 +19433%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	1−2 −16800%	169 +16800%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2 −16800%	169 +16800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −775%	170−180 +775%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −4550%	90−95 +4550%
World of Tanks	18−20 −2616%	500−550 +2616%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −4250%	85−90 +4250%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −297%	123 +297%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2900%	120−130 +2900%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −2186%	160−170 +2186%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −39600%	397 +39600%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 −6333%	190−200 +6333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −3583%	221 +3583%
Valorant	9−10 −5100%	450−500 +5100%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −1069%	187 +1069%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −1147%	187 +1147%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −2513%	200−210 +2513%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −6300%	60−65 +6300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −1147%	187 +1147%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −4450%	90−95 +4450%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2900%	60−65 +2900%
Dota 2	16−18 −3025%	500−550 +3025%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −3400%	100−110 +3400%
Fortnite	1−2 −9500%	95−100 +9500%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	201
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 −12500%	120−130 +12500%
Valorant	3−4 −9133%	270−280 +9133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Metro Exodus

171

+0%

171

+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	134 +0%	134 +0%
Metro Exodus	106 +0%	106 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

120−130

+0%

120−130

+0%

This is how HD Graphics P530 and RTX 4080 SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4080 SUPER is 3163% faster in 1080p
RTX 4080 SUPER is 3460% faster in 1440p
RTX 4080 SUPER is 3800% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4080 SUPER is 39600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4080 SUPER is ahead in 51 test (93%)
there's a draw in 4 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.79	89.06
Recency	1 September 2015	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	1740 MB	16 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	320 Watt

HD Graphics P530 has 2033.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 3092.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 841.6% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P530 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.