GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs HD Graphics P4600

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics P4600 with GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics P4600
2013
84 Watt
1.47

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms HD Graphics P4600 by a whopping 2844% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking97373
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.2927.74
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2GA104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1605632
Core clock speed350 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors392 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00248.2
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS15.88 TFLOPS
ROPs280
TMUs20176
Tensor Coresno data176
Ray Tracing Coresno data44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.801.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics P4600 1.47
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 43.28
+2844%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics P4600 605
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 17836
+2848%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−3800%
117
+3800%
1440p2−3
−3600%
74
+3600%
4K1−2
−4800%
49
+4800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 111
+0%
111
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 129
+0%
129
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 97
+0%
97
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 254
+0%
254
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 133
+0%
133
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 231
+0%
231
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 91
+0%
91
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Dota 2 142
+0%
142
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Fortnite 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 202
+0%
202
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+0%
141
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 121
+0%
121
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 82
+0%
82
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+0%
69
+0%
Dota 2 138
+0%
138
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 178
+0%
178
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 101
+0%
101
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 193
+0%
193
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 94
+0%
94
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+0%
94
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
World of Tanks 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 43
+0%
43
+0%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 137
+0%
137
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 145
+0%
145
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 95
+0%
95
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+0%
95
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Dota 2 128
+0%
128
+0%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 81
+0%
81
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 78
+0%
78
+0%

This is how HD Graphics P4600 and RTX 3070 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 3800% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 3600% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 4800% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.47 43.28
Recency 1 June 2013 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 22 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 115 Watt

HD Graphics P4600 has 36.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2844.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 175% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P4600 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics P4600 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics P4600
HD Graphics P4600
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 36 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 904 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.