Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs HD Graphics P3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics P3000 with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics P3000
2011
0.67

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms HD Graphics P3000 by a whopping 1325% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
HD Graphics P3000 HD Graphics P3000
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1238497
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Xe LPG (2023−2025)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT2Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 February 2011 (15 years ago)14 December 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores964
Core clock speed850 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors995 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm5 nm
Texture fill rate16.20no data
Floating-point processing power0.2592 TFLOPSno data
ROPs2no data
TMUs12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12_2
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−2400%
25
+2400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how HD Graphics P3000 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 2400% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.67 9.55
Recency 1 February 2011 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 1325.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics P3000 is a desktop graphics card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel HD Graphics P3000
HD Graphics P3000
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD Graphics P3000 HD Graphics P3000
vs
ATI HD 2600 XT Radeon HD 2600 XT
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
HD Graphics P3000 HD Graphics P3000
vs
HD 8330 Radeon HD 8330
ATI 3000 IGP ATI Radeon 3000 IGP
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh
ATI 3000 IGP ATI Radeon 3000 IGP
vs
RX 7700S RX 7700S
ATI 3000 IGP ATI Radeon 3000 IGP
vs
UHD Graphics 630 Mobile Graphics 630 Mobile
ATI 3000 IGP ATI Radeon 3000 IGP
vs
RTX 4070 AD103 RTX 4070 AD103
ATI 3000 IGP ATI Radeon 3000 IGP
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400
HD 6290 IGP AMD Radeon HD 6290 IGP
vs
RX 560 XT RX 560 XT
Tegra 4i NVIDIA Tegra 4i
vs
RTX 3080 12 GB RTX 3080 12 GB
Tegra 4i NVIDIA Tegra 4i
vs
RTX 4090 Mobile RTX 4090 Mobile
Tegra 4i NVIDIA Tegra 4i
vs
RX 6550M RX 6550M
HD Graphics P4700 Intel HD Graphics P4700
vs
RTX 2060 Mobile RTX 2060 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 54 votes

Rate HD Graphics P3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 38 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics P3000 or Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.