Quadro T1000 vs HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)

Place in the ranking	1198	326
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	23.18
Architecture	Gen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2012)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Ivy Bridge GT1	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	1 October 2012 (12 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	6	no data
Core clock speed	350 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	50 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	no data	8000 MHz
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.0	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	no data	4.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−2525%

210−220
+2525%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −2567%	240−250 +2567%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −2567%	240−250 +2567%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −2567%	160−170 +2567%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −2500%	130−140 +2500%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −2567%	240−250 +2567%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −2525%	210−220 +2525%
Fortnite	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −2567%	160−170 +2567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −2567%	240−250 +2567%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −2500%	130−140 +2500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −2500%	130−140 +2500%
World of Tanks	11 −2536%	290−300 +2536%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −2567%	240−250 +2567%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −2525%	210−220 +2525%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −2567%	160−170 +2567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −2567%	240−250 +2567%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −2567%	80−85 +2567%
World of Tanks	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −2567%	240−250 +2567%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −2400%	100−105 +2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Valorant	5−6 −2500%	130−140 +2500%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −2567%	400−450 +2567%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −2567%	400−450 +2567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −2567%	400−450 +2567%