GeForce PCX 5900 vs HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) with GeForce PCX 5900, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
2012
0.61
+578%

HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) outperforms PCX 5900 by a whopping 578% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12011463
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2012)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1NV35
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 October 2012 (12 years ago)17 March 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6no data
Core clock speed350 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data135 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm130 nm
Texture fill rateno data2.800
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data275 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data17.6 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.09.0a
OpenGLno data1.5 (2.1)
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
+700%
1−2
−700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
World of Tanks 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1
World of Tanks 2−3 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1
Valorant 5−6 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Dota 2 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Valorant 1−2 0−1

This is how HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) and PCX 5900 compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) is 700% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 0.09
Recency 1 October 2012 17 March 2003
Chip lithography 22 nm 130 nm

HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) has a 577.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 490.9% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce PCX 5900 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) is a notebook card while GeForce PCX 5900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5900
GeForce PCX 5900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 54 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce PCX 5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.