ATI Radeon 9600 TX vs HD Graphics (Haswell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Haswell) with Radeon 9600 TX, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics (Haswell)
2012
0.79
+1875%

HD Graphics (Haswell) outperforms ATI 9600 TX by a whopping 1875% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11851530
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 7.5 Haswell (2012)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameHaswell GT1R300
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 October 2012 (12 years ago)7 October 2003 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10no data
Core clock speed200 MHz297 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data110 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm150 nm
Texture fill rateno data2.376
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataFloppy

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data270 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8.64 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.19.0 (9_0)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
God of War 5−6 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
God of War 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 0−1
Valorant 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 12−14 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
God of War 5−6 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3 0−1
Valorant 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 12−14 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
God of War 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1
Valorant 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 4−5 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

God of War 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 0.04
Recency 1 October 2012 7 October 2003
Chip lithography 22 nm 150 nm

HD Graphics (Haswell) has a 1875% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 581.8% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics (Haswell) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9600 TX in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Haswell) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9600 TX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
HD Graphics (Haswell)
ATI Radeon 9600 TX
Radeon 9600 TX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 30 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Haswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 9 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 TX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Haswell) or Radeon 9600 TX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.