P106-090 vs HD Graphics (Haswell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Haswell) with P106-090, including specs and performance data.


HD Graphics (Haswell)
2012
0.79

P106-090 outperforms HD Graphics (Haswell) by a whopping 713% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1207623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.59
ArchitectureGen. 7.5 Haswell (2012)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameHaswell GT1GP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2012 (13 years ago)31 July 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10768
Core clock speed200 MHz1354 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1531 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data73.49
Floating-point processing powerno data2.352 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data48
L1 Cacheno data288 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x1
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data3 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2002 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6
−650%
45−50
+650%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Valorant 30−33
−700%
240−250
+700%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−673%
170−180
+673%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Dota 2 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−700%
24−27
+700%
Valorant 30−33
−700%
240−250
+700%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Dota 2 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Valorant 30−33
−700%
240−250
+700%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−686%
110−120
+686%
Valorant 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

This is how HD Graphics (Haswell) and P106-090 compete in popular games:

  • P106-090 is 650% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 6.42
Recency 1 October 2012 31 July 2017
Chip lithography 22 nm 16 nm

P106-090 has a 713% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

The P106-090 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Haswell) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Haswell) is a notebook graphics card while P106-090 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 32 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Haswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 71 votes

Rate P106-090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Haswell) or P106-090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.