Quadro4 980 XGL vs HD Graphics (Broadwell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Broadwell) with Quadro4 980 XGL, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics (Broadwell)
2015
0.89
+8800%

HD Graphics (Broadwell) outperforms Quadro4 980 XGL by a whopping 8800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11901577
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 8 Broadwell (2015)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT1NV28 A2
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 January 2015 (11 years ago)12 November 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12no data
Core clock speed100 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data36 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Texture fill rateno data2.400
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data325 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data10.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)8.1
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 0−1
Valorant 30−33 0−1

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1
Valorant 30−33 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1
Valorant 30−33 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 4−5 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.89 0.01
Recency 5 January 2015 12 November 2002
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm

HD Graphics (Broadwell) has a 8800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 971% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics (Broadwell) is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro4 980 XGL in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Broadwell) is a notebook graphics card while Quadro4 980 XGL is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 6 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Broadwell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 102 votes

Rate Quadro4 980 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Broadwell) or Quadro4 980 XGL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.