Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs HD Graphics (Broadwell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Broadwell) with Quadro P3200 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics (Broadwell)
2015
0.89

P3200 Max-Q outperforms HD Graphics (Broadwell) by a whopping 2362% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1190293
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.49
ArchitectureGen. 8 Broadwell (2015)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT1GP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 January 2015 (11 years ago)21 February 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores121792
Core clock speed100 MHz1139 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHz1404 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data157.2
Floating-point processing powerno data5.032 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data112
L1 Cacheno data672 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1753 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data168.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Fortnite 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2233%
140−150
+2233%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2275%
190−200
+2275%
Valorant 30−33
−2233%
700−750
+2233%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−2291%
550−600
+2291%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Dota 2 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Fortnite 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2233%
140−150
+2233%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2275%
190−200
+2275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2233%
140−150
+2233%
Valorant 30−33
−2233%
700−750
+2233%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Dota 2 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2233%
140−150
+2233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2275%
190−200
+2275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2233%
140−150
+2233%
Valorant 30−33
−2233%
700−750
+2233%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−2344%
220−230
+2344%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
Valorant 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.89 21.91
Recency 5 January 2015 21 February 2018
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm

HD Graphics (Broadwell) has a 14% more advanced lithography process.

P3200 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 2362% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Broadwell) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Broadwell) is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 6 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Broadwell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 27 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Broadwell) or Quadro P3200 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.