GeForce Go 7700 vs HD Graphics (Broadwell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Broadwell) and GeForce Go 7700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.


HD Graphics (Broadwell)
2015
0.89
+154%

HD Graphics (Broadwell) outperforms Go 7700 by a whopping 154% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11901349
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 8 Broadwell (2015)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT1G73
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2015 (11 years ago)1 August 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1217
Core clock speed100 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistorsno data177 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Texture fill rateno data5.400
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Valorant 30−33
+15.4%
24−27
−15.4%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 30−33
+15.4%
24−27
−15.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 30−33
+15.4%
24−27
−15.4%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the HD Graphics (Broadwell) is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD Graphics (Broadwell) performs better in 25 tests (93%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.89 0.35
Recency 5 January 2015 1 August 2006
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm

HD Graphics (Broadwell) has a 154% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics (Broadwell) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7700 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 6 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Broadwell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 29 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Broadwell) or GeForce Go 7700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.