GeForce 8200 vs HD Graphics (Broadwell)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Broadwell) with GeForce 8200, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics (Broadwell)
2015
0.89
+128%

HD Graphics (Broadwell) outperforms 8200 by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11811323
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.75
ArchitectureGen. 8 Broadwell (2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT1C78
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2015 (10 years ago)6 May 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1216
Core clock speed100 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data210 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCI
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64/128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Valorant 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Valorant 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Valorant 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Valorant 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.89 0.39
Recency 5 January 2015 6 May 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm

HD Graphics (Broadwell) has a 128.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics (Broadwell) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Broadwell) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8200 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
NVIDIA GeForce 8200
GeForce 8200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 6 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Broadwell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 66 votes

Rate GeForce 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Broadwell) or GeForce 8200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.