FirePro M4150 vs HD Graphics (Broadwell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Broadwell) with FirePro M4150, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics (Broadwell)
2015
0.89

M4150 outperforms HD Graphics (Broadwell) by a whopping 179% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1190880
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 8 Broadwell (2015)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT1Opal
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 January 2015 (11 years ago)16 October 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12384
Core clock speed100 MHz715 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data950 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Texture fill rateno data17.16
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5491 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Fortnite 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Valorant 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Dota 2 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Fortnite 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Valorant 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Dota 2 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Valorant 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Valorant 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.89 2.48
Recency 5 January 2015 16 October 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

HD Graphics (Broadwell) has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

FirePro M4150, on the other hand, has a 179% higher aggregate performance score.

The FirePro M4150 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Broadwell) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Broadwell) is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M4150 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 6 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Broadwell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 17 votes

Rate FirePro M4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Broadwell) or FirePro M4150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.